The pre-9/11 intel was too vague for Bush to take action, but Clinton should have killed bin Laden

I can imagine someone like Rush making the case that Bush can't be blamed for 911 because, jeeze, the info was vague and how much can a President do?

So Rush could criticize me for asking too much of Bush. But then Rush shows he is nothing but another irrational partisan: he insists that Clinton COULD and SHOULD have stopped the planners.

Rush wants it both ways. The info was too vague to blame Bush, but whatever info there was, it was what Clinton could gather.

Rush says that that vague info should've been enough for Clinton to prevent the attack, but the same info was too vague for Bush to have done a thing.

This is why it's hard to take the Rush seriously.