Liberals don't want necessary cost effective public/provate contracts

No Rush - you’re not following here.
Of course I support public/private partnerships and see a role for private sector contracts with the government.

It is the hypocrisy that I hold up to appropriate ridicule.

1. Your mouthpiece and sycophant, Ron claims to be a defense contractor and hold oil stocks. He supported a phony invasion based purely on lies, which benefits those who support military activity, and which also just happened to conquer an oil-rich nation to boost those alleged oil stocks.

I don’t know what his business is.

Let’s say it is making armor for our vehicles.
HE SUPPORTED A WAR FOR OIL.
Yes, now that we are there, maybe his product reduces deaths.
If we had not gone at all, if we didn’t have ANY soldiers on those oil fields - ooopsie, I mean battle fields - there would be no deaths of heroes to reduce.

2. Again, it is the hypocrisy - over and over and over he ridicules “gummint” spending, but much of that “gummint” spending that he whines about goes to CONTRACTORS LIKE HIM.

If he had either not supported the war, or at least not always ridiculed those who - LIKE HIM - benefit from public spending, the target of ridicule wouldn’t have been quite so juicy.

As for his “character,” Ron joins other conservatives who have been repeatedly, repeatedly caught red-handed misrepresenting their own sources, misrepresenting what liberals’ own blogs said, or just made up “facts” with no sources at all that others quickly debunked with valid sources.

That is not an honest engagement on the issues.
That does not reflect well on his “character.”
No matter who he is, respected, wealthy, successful defense contractor or wannabee pimply-faced teenaged geek, lying about sources is not “character.”