If you haven't watched John Coleman, you cannot criticize him

Why would anyone feel the need to actually watch an anti-science propaganda piece by someone with no science credentials?

I do not need to see every piece of propaganda by unofficial, uncredentialed sources in order to determine that, lacking credibility, I do not need to watch them.

In the same way, I doubt you watch very many of the liberal pieces but do not hesitate to discredit them.

While it is my opinion that Al Gore, who as DDWiz pointed out, is a non-scientist with a journalism degree just like Coleman, except that Gore also has a ton more additional achievements and has more credibility because he explains real science rather than arguing with it, I would never, ever cite him as an original source.

And don’t give me the baloney about all the “scientists” who disagree with the consensus view.
As has been pointed out by many in this blog, none more so than Wiz himself, the vast majority of them of them are (1) not real scientists, are (2) funded by oil companies, and (3)are not published in peer reviewed journals due to their ineptness.

If someone finds Coleman entertaining, watch him.
If not, there is absolutely no reason on earth to do so.

thanks to the wisdom of Emerald